Tariffs on Apparel & Clothing imported from Cambodia (2026)

Apparel runs on thin retail margins, and most garments sold by Shopify merchants are produced overseas, so a typical item crosses a border and absorbs duty before it reaches a customer. This category has historically carried some of the higher baseline rates in the US tariff schedule, and recent country-specific surcharges layered on top of that base can hit clothing harder than many other goods. When the landed cost of a garment moves, a cheaper domestic alternative is often not available to pivot to, which is why a tariff change tends to show up directly in your unit economics.

Base HTS / MFN duty (apparel)~14%
Section 122 surcharge (expires 2026-07-24)~10%
Effective stacked rate on landed cost~24%

Representative 2026 estimate stacking base MFN duty (USITC HTS 2026 Rev.10), Section 301 on China-origin goods (USTR), Section 232 on autos and steel/aluminum/copper articles (CRS IN12545), and the 10% Section 122 surcharge that expires 2026-07-24 and is under appeal (Skadden). Your exact per-SKU duty depends on the precise HS code, which MarginGuard resolves from the live HTS schedule once connected. Not legal or customs advice.

Cambodia is a long-standing low-cost manufacturing base whose exports to the US now carry a reciprocal-era tariff load on top of the normal HTS base duty set by each product's classification. That stacking matters for landed cost: the country-specific load can apply on top of the base rate across many categories, so the duty you pay may no longer be just the historic base rate for your goods, though the exact treatment still depends on your product's HS code. Cambodia has no comprehensive US free trade agreement, so there is no across-the-board duty preference to fall back on, and the representative stacked rate in the box above reflects the current-era treatment. Because rates in this era are set largely through policy action and have been adjusted on short timelines, the number can change between order cycles, so treat it as a snapshot rather than a fixed input.

Cambodia is a genuine China alternative for apparel and footwear and a common first stop when diversifying out of China, but it is not a duty-free escape hatch. It carries its own reciprocal-era load, so the right comparison is Cambodia's stacked rate against China's stacked rate for your specific HS codes, not Cambodia against a pre-tariff baseline. The catch is twofold: the country load is set at the national level, while the duty you actually pay still tracks each product's HS classification, and rules of origin decide whether goods count as Cambodian in the first place. If fabric, components, or major assembly trace back to China, transshipment and substantial-transformation scrutiny can negate the benefit, and any preferential program you hope to use depends on meeting its origin rules. Treat Cambodia as a way to reduce, not eliminate, tariff exposure, and validate the landed-cost delta per SKU before committing volume.

What the tariff does to a $45 jacket

Retail price$45.00
Your cost (50% of price)$22.50
Margin before the tariff50%
Landed cost after ~24% tariff$27.90
Margin after the tariff38%
Price to charge to hold a 40% margin$46.50 (+3.3%)

That's a single SKU. Across a full catalog the tariff hits every imported product differently depending on its cost and price — which is exactly why margin damage hides until a quarter closes light.

See which of YOUR apparel went underwater

Paste your Shopify URL. In about ten seconds you'll see every SKU that dropped below your target margin after the current Cambodia tariffs — and the exact price to charge to recover each one. Free, no login.

Scan your store free →

How the reprice math works

Landed cost = unit cost × (1 + tariff rate). To get back to a target margin M, the recovery price is landed cost ÷ (1 − M). For a $45 jacket from Cambodia at a 24% stacked rate, that means charging $46.50 to hold a 40% margin. Round to a clean price point and test it; the point is to stop selling underwater.

What actually drives the duty on apparel

Apparel is classified largely under HTS Chapters 61 (knitted or crocheted garments) and 62 (woven, not knitted), and the split between those two chapters is often the first thing that moves your rate. From there, duty is typically driven by the dominant fiber by weight (cotton, wool, man-made fiber, or silk), the construction (knit vs woven), the garment type, and gender or age cut, so a women's woven cotton blouse and a men's knit synthetic shirt can land on very different lines. The exact per-SKU rate depends on the full HS code, not the category average, and the same physical item can plausibly fall under more than one code until you confirm the fiber content and construction.

A common and costly mistake is misreading fiber content on blends: classification generally follows the fiber that predominates by weight, so a garment that is 60% polyester / 40% cotton is typically duty-rated as man-made fiber, not cotton, even if it looks and feels like a cotton tee. Merchants sometimes pull a code straight from a supplier's loose description and get the chapter or fiber basis wrong, which can change the rate meaningfully and can lead to back-duty if CBP later reclassifies it. As general guidance, confirm the actual content-label percentages, the knit-versus-woven construction, and whether trim or coatings push the item to a different heading before you rely on any code.

Apparel sourcing is relatively mobile, since cut-and-sew and knit capacity exists across many countries, so origin shopping can be a real lever here in a way it often is not for niche specialty goods. As a general rule, origin is set by where the garment is substantially transformed (commonly where it is cut and sewn) rather than where the fabric or the brand is from, though the specific substantial-transformation and origin rules vary by program and country, and some programs add yarn-forward rules that look further up the supply chain. Treat this as general guidance, not legal or customs advice, and price in the full landed cost per origin: a unit price that looks lower from a higher-tariff country can erase its own savings once duty is applied.

Common questions

Why is the duty on my clothing higher than on other products I import?

Apparel has historically carried elevated baseline rates in the US schedule, and these tend to be higher than the average for many other consumer goods, in part because clothing has historically been treated as a protected category. Recent country-specific surcharges can stack on top of that base, so garments often absorb more duty than electronics or housewares from the same supplier country. That combination is why a small rate change can move your clothing margin noticeably. The exact rate still depends on the specific HS code for each item.

My supplier gave me an HS code. Can I just use it?

A supplier's code is generally a starting point, not a guarantee. As a general matter the importer of record is responsible for correct classification and can bear the cost if CBP disagrees, so it is worth verifying. Suppliers sometimes default to a familiar code or mislabel blend percentages, and the right line depends on confirmed fiber content, knit-versus-woven construction, and garment cut. Check it against the actual content label and the Chapter 61 or 62 headings before relying on it for landed-cost math. This is general guidance, not legal or customs advice.

Does changing where my clothes are made actually lower the tariff?

It can, because the rate depends on country of origin and apparel assembly is relatively mobile across many countries. As a general rule, origin is determined by where the garment is substantially transformed, usually where it is cut and sewn, rather than where you buy it or where the brand sits, though the specific origin rules vary and are worth confirming against current guidance. Some trade programs add yarn-forward or fabric-origin rules that require earlier supply-chain steps to qualify for a preferential rate. Compare the full landed cost per origin rather than the unit price alone, since a cheaper factory in a higher-tariff country can give back its savings in duty.

Is sourcing from Cambodia cheaper than from China after tariffs?

Often, but not automatically. Cambodia carries its own reciprocal-era load on top of the base HTS duty, so the saving comes from the gap between Cambodia's stacked rate and China's stacked rate for your exact products, not from any duty-free status. Run the landed-cost math per HS code, since the answer can flip for some categories. This is general guidance, not customs advice.

Does Cambodia qualify for duty-free treatment into the US?

Do not assume so. Cambodia has no comprehensive US free trade agreement, and any preferential program is conditional on meeting its rules of origin, which depend on where materials and processing actually originate. Consider confirming eligibility for your specific goods with a customs broker before pricing a duty-free landed cost. This is general guidance, not customs advice.

Could goods I source from Cambodia be treated as Chinese for tariff purposes?

Possibly, if origin is not genuinely Cambodian. Customs generally looks at substantial transformation, and apparel and footwear typically have category-specific origin rules. If fabric or key components come from China and only light finishing happens in Cambodia, the goods may be treated as Chinese or flagged for transshipment, which can wipe out the intended saving. Keep supplier documentation that supports the country of origin you declare, and confirm the specifics with a customs broker. This is general guidance, not customs advice.

Related guides

Stop guessing. Scan your catalog.

MarginGuard watches every imported SKU and alerts you the moment a tariff change pushes one below your target margin — with the exact recovery price.

Scan your store free →